Back to All Blog Posts

AI, Crypto Banks and Treasury: The Rules Around Access Are Changing | Live Q&A

In this live Q&A, Lynette Zang focused on a theme running beneath several seemingly unrelated developments: the rules around access are changing. 

From AI data centers competing for electricity and water, to digital asset companies moving deeper into regulated banking, to the U.S. Treasury considering different ways to manage liquidity, Lynette argued that growing pressure within a system often leads to changes in who receives access, who receives priority, and who can alter the rules. 

That same concern shaped the viewer Q&A. Questions ranged from hyperinflation and property taxes to Goldbacks, ETFs, crypto, brokerage ownership, government reporting requirements, counterfeit metals, and the role of physical gold and silver in a broader sound money strategy. 

“When paying property taxes with our gold, what might they look like? Does my current $4,000 tax stay the same? Meaning, will the 1 ounce it costs to pay today’s remain approximately 1 ounce in four years into hyperinflation? What does history suggest?” 

Lynette said history suggests that gold has maintained its ability to cover obligations such as property taxes during hyperinflationary periods. 

If approximately one ounce of gold were required to cover a property tax bill today, she said it could potentially require a similar amount, or even less, during a hyperinflationary event. She emphasized that this is part of Zang International’s sound money strategy. 

Property taxes remain an important risk because owning a home outright does not eliminate the obligation to pay them. Lynette pointed to the Great Depression, when people could lose property for unpaid taxes even if there was no mortgage. 

She also said the sound money strategy considers the possibility of paying off a mortgage during the first monetary reset. While she cannot guarantee exactly how a future reset would unfold, she said historical experience suggests there may be a limited window in which such a strategy could be executed. 

“I recently heard Gerald Celente say that he believes the collapse will happen in the end of September or early October. All other podcasters have said next year or even into ’28 or ’29. Why the difference?” 

Lynette said she takes Gerald Celente’s trend analysis seriously because of his long experience studying cycles, but she stopped short of predicting that a full collapse would occur on a specific date. 

She stressed that this uncertainty is exactly why preparation matters. 

Once a collapse occurs, choices become much more limited. Before that point, people still have an opportunity to act with urgency rather than waiting for an emergency. 

Lynette pointed to market volatility, overvalued assets, unusual movements in bond markets, government and Treasury interventions, inflation, and weakening consumer confidence as signals worth watching. She said a faster rise in inflation could potentially push confidence lower and contribute to a crisis of confidence. 

However, she explicitly warned viewers not to represent her comments as a prediction that a collapse would definitely occur at the end of September or beginning of October. 

Her message was instead to build resilience while options remain available. That includes local relationships, community, food, water, energy, security, barterability, wealth preservation, shelter, and tangible assets held outside financial counterparties. 

“What are your thoughts on local currency and sound money like Goldbacks? Are they a valid option to combat the dollar’s devaluation?” 

Lynette distinguished between local or state-issued scrip and Goldbacks. 

She said a state could potentially issue its own scrip during a period of severe monetary stress, but such currency would still depend primarily on confidence if nothing tangible backed it. 

Goldbacks are different because physical gold is embedded within them. Lynette said she could see a role for Goldbacks because they allow someone to carry a very small amount of physical gold. 

The challenge, in her view, is local adoption. 

During a financial crisis, she believes people also need immediately recognizable and liquid cash outside the banking system as a first line of defense. How much cash is appropriate depends on an individual’s circumstances, including whether they are working, receiving a paycheck, retired, or dependent on investments for income. 

She described Goldbacks as something that could potentially fit within the cash portion of a broader sound money strategy. 

“Please, can you show where we can find the physical gold price chart you show sometimes?” 

Lynette directed viewers to StockCharts.com and explained that the site can be used free of charge. 

She demonstrated charts for spot gold, GLD, moving averages, and relative performance. 

She explained that the 200-day moving average is calculated by adding the closing price for each of the previous 200 days and dividing by 200. She described it as acting somewhat like a rudder, with prices tending to move back toward that longer-term average after traveling far above or below it. 

She also demonstrated the 50-day moving average and showed how StockCharts can compare assets through its relative performance feature. 

Most importantly, Lynette cautioned viewers about terminology. A chart labeled “gold,” in her view, may actually represent a spot gold contract rather than physical metal. 

Her distinction remained consistent throughout the discussion: a contract tied to gold is not the same thing as holding physical gold in your possession. 

Viewer Concern: Medicare Rules and Asset Recovery 

A viewer raised the concern that some Medicare-related regulations may allow government recovery from a person’s estate after substantial medical expenses, potentially affecting a home. 

Lynette said there are circumstances involving medical benefits and asset recovery that deserve closer examination, but she was not certain about the specific house-related rule raised by the viewer. 

Rather than make a definitive claim, she said the issue should be researched further and potentially addressed in a separate update. 

“Why can’t we demand to be paid in gold or silver from our corporate employers?” 

Lynette said people can ask to be paid in gold or silver. 

The larger obstacle, she argued, is that generations have been trained to stop thinking about gold and silver as money. 

She illustrated this by comparing a $20 gold coin, a $20 gold certificate, and a $20 Federal Reserve note. Because all three carried the same stated denomination and historically circulated alongside one another, people came to perceive them as equivalent. 

Lynette emphasized that they were not structurally the same. 

Physical gold was the asset itself. A gold certificate represented a claim on the asset. Federal Reserve currency became a debt-based monetary instrument. 

For Lynette, the most important function of money is preserving the value of a person’s labor through time. She argued that physical gold and silver have broad global uses that give them functionality beyond a single government or financial system. 

She encouraged viewers interested in restoring the monetary role of gold to participate in sound money initiatives and support legislation that protects the ability to own and redeem tangible assets. 

“People who own crypto need to offramp it to a bank to get cash. How would converting physical gold and silver be any different?” 

Lynette acknowledged that there are circumstances where physical gold or silver must also be converted into the prevailing currency. 

For example, if a mortgage must be paid in U.S. dollars, the metal may need to be converted so that payment can be made. 

Her distinction was about what happens before that conversion. 

Cryptocurrency, she said, remains intangible and inside digital systems. Physical gold and silver can be held directly outside those systems. 

Her central principle was: if you do not hold it, you do not own it outright. 

She used older silver dimes as an example. A pre-1965 dime and a modern dime can carry the same face value while being made from fundamentally different materials. For Lynette, that difference in underlying substance matters. 

She said physical gold and silver provide another layer of optionality because possession does not require continued access to a digital platform, bank account, or payment rail. 

“How long might it take to inflate away $40 trillion in debt?” 

Lynette said it could happen very quickly under the right conditions. 

She pointed viewers to Federal Reserve data on M2 money velocity, which measures how quickly money moves through the economy. 

She said the data shows significant changes in monetary velocity and argued that the system may already contain the conditions for hyperinflation. 

In her analysis, the key trigger that could make hyperinflation dramatically more visible would be a major public loss of confidence. 

Because she believes confidence has already weakened substantially, Lynette said the system could be closer to a major transition than many people realize. She did not give a guaranteed date. 

Her recommendation was to use the remaining period of choice to establish a sound money strategy, strengthen relationships with neighbors, build local community, and prepare the necessities of life before conditions become more difficult. 

“There are risks everywhere. When you buy physical, you have to wonder, do I own gold and silver or do I own tungsten? How do you combat this risk?” 

Lynette said the first step is buying from a certified and reputable dealer. 

She said Zang International works with certified wholesalers and that metals purchased through the company are certified. 

She also emphasized that a strategy should include an exit plan, not simply an acquisition plan. 

Lynette referenced methods for checking metals, including ping testing and the fact that gold and silver are not magnetic. She also noted that sterling silver is commonly marked “925.” 

Her broader advice was simple: do the homework, work with reputable professionals, and understand who stands behind the metal being purchased. 

“Why does anyone assign value to gold or tulips? How about a currency built on something useful like land?” 

Lynette said many different objects and commodities have been tried as money throughout history. 

The challenge with land is that it lacks several practical monetary characteristics. It is not portable and cannot easily be divided for everyday exchange. 

She said money needs to perform four important functions: 

  • A unit of account for pricing 
  • A medium of exchange for trade 
  • A way to value labor 
  • Most importantly, a store of the value of labor through time 

Food can be useful but has a shelf life. Large physical objects may have value but lack portability. Land can provide shelter and produce food, but it cannot easily circulate as money. 

Lynette said gold has historically stood apart because it meets the criteria for sound money while also having broad global use. 

Silver remains important in her strategy, particularly for barterability, but she described gold as the primary monetary metal. 

“Who controls this ETF market? What is the real proof that it is linked to actual gold? Who audits these processes?” 

Lynette said large banks play an important role within the ETF structure, including serving in administrative and custodial capacities. 

She explained that public ETF companies file regulatory reports such as 10-Ks, where investors can review audited information. 

Using GLD as an example, she compared the ETF with the spot gold market and showed how their relative performance can diverge over time. 

According to Lynette, part of that divergence reflects gold being sold from the trust to cover ongoing expenses and fees. 

She emphasized that an individual ETF investor owns shares of a trust rather than direct title to specific physical gold in their personal possession. 

For Lynette, this makes ETFs potentially useful as trading instruments, but fundamentally different from direct physical ownership. 

Her conclusion was consistent with the rest of the Q&A: for the portion of a portfolio intended to provide direct ownership and barterability, she favors taking possession of the physical asset. 

“Lynette, will you please speak to the government new rules regarding requiring identifications of metal purchases and, of course, the 28% tax? Where is privacy? Where is protection?” 

Lynette said rules concerning identification requirements may vary by state and said she wanted to research the specific regulatory change before speaking definitively about it. 

On taxes, she emphasized that Zang International complies with the law. 

She said the sound money strategy is designed to consider taxes, fees, losses, and other costs as part of the overall plan rather than ignoring them. 

Her focus is preserving principal and building a strategy capable of addressing those costs legally. 

Regarding privacy, Lynette said direct physical ownership falls into a different category from many financial assets, but she was equally clear that Zang International will comply with every applicable legal requirement. 

“Obviously Tether will be backed by gold. Where do we get on the new financial digital system though? Are you talking about the QFS or something else?” 

Lynette said the digital financial rails are already being built. 

She pointed back to the increasing number of digital asset companies seeking bank charters as evidence that crypto and fintech are becoming more integrated into the regulated banking system. 

Her answer to where people “get on” the digital system was that they are effectively already on it because the infrastructure is being constructed around them. 

She believes this makes the effort to restore redeemable gold to the monetary system especially important. 

For Lynette, redeemability is the key distinction. A person must be able to take possession of the underlying asset in order to retain meaningful control. 

She framed the broader issue as a choice between direct ownership and a system in which central banks, governments, corporations, and financial intermediaries increasingly control access. 

“Do you accept payments for purchases on your website?” 

Lynette initially said operational questions were better answered by the Zang International team. 

Later in the livestream, she relayed the clarification from Emerald: those payments are not accepted directly through the website. The company may accept them, but Zang International will not initiate them. 

She recommended calling the team for details because the exact process depends on how the transaction is handled. 

“So, what’s the point in everyone praying to the god of the spot market? Every dealer, every buyer looks at the spot price and that’s what they base it on. Sure, there’s premium, but it still isn’t close.” 

Lynette said the dominance of the spot market comes from decades of financialization and training investors to think about gold and silver primarily as trades rather than as money. 

She argued that the paper trading market shaped the public perception of what “gold” means. 

In her explanation, gold was removed from direct monetary circulation in stages. She referenced the changes of 1933, the removal of silver from circulating coinage in the 1960s, the closing of gold convertibility for foreign governments in 1971, and the later creation of the spot gold trading market. 

Lynette encouraged viewers to research these developments themselves rather than accept anyone’s interpretation blindly. 

Her goal, she said, is to help people understand the structure well enough to draw their own conclusions. 

“What is that horse-looking thing on your desk?” 

Lynette explained that the object was a Trojan horse. 

She uses it as a visual metaphor for cryptocurrency and the transition toward a new financial infrastructure. 

Her concern is that systems promoted as convenient or liberating can ultimately create greater dependence on centralized rails and permission. 

She contrasted that dependence with her eight-part preparation framework of food, water, energy, security, barterability, wealth preservation, community, and shelter. 

“Will copper coins ever be worth anything?” 

Lynette said older U.S. pennies contain significant amounts of copper. 

She specifically said pennies made before 1982 contain 95% copper, while later pennies contained less. 

For that reason, she said older copper pennies possess value based on their copper content. 

“My brokerage account with Schwab shows I own certain stocks, but I have to depend on Schwab to deliver the actual stock and any dividends. Do I need to request the actual certificates?” 

Lynette explained that when she began working as a stockbroker in the 1980s, it was more common for investors either to hold stock certificates directly or have shares registered with the issuing company. 

Today, the system is more heavily intermediated, and physical stock certificates may not always be available. 

She said the first step is to contact Schwab and ask what options are available. 

If an investor takes possession of certificates, those certificates may later have to be delivered again in order to sell. 

Another possibility is contacting investor relations at the issuing company to ask whether it offers a direct registration or similar program. 

Lynette also emphasized checking whether the brokerage account is a margin account because margin arrangements may allow the broker to use the investor’s equity. 

Her immediate recommendation was to understand the account agreement, determine what the brokerage is permitted to do with the assets, and ask what direct ownership options exist. 

“Then why do they let us have gold in jewelry, picture frames, and mantles? Why don’t they confiscate that?” 

Lynette said the difference comes down to legal classification. 

She noted that jewelry and certain collectible forms of gold historically received different treatment from other forms of monetary gold. 

Lynette discussed restrictions that existed when she was younger and said jewelry and certain pre-1933 collectible coins could be held even when ownership of other forms of gold was more restricted. 

For her, the broader lesson is that rules often treat similar assets differently depending on their classification. 

She said that is one reason she pays close attention not simply to the asset itself, but to how laws and financial systems define it. 

“Do you dream of charts and grass at night?” 

Lynette joked that sometimes she does, but said her larger focus is the people following her work. 

She spoke about the responsibility she feels to continue researching and explaining monetary change, as well as her commitment to improving the educational material Zang International produces. 

She emphasized that the work is not hers alone, crediting the broader team and the community around Zang International. 

Her closing message brought the entire livestream back to one principle: 

Sovereignty begins with what you choose to truly own. 

The Bigger Message: Understand What Your Access Depends On 

Across the livestream, Lynette repeatedly returned to the difference between owning an asset and holding a claim that depends on somebody else performing. 

Bank deposits depend on banking rails. Brokerage assets depend on intermediaries. Digital assets depend on technology, networks, and access. ETFs represent shares in a structure rather than personal possession of the underlying metal. 

Physical gold and silver occupy a different role in Lynette’s framework because they can be held directly. 

That does not mean physical gold and silver solve every problem. Lynette specifically emphasized that they do not solve shortages of electricity, water, food, or shelter. 

That is why her preparation framework extends far beyond precious metals. 

For Lynette, sound money strategies are part of a larger approach to financial freedom, economic collapse preparation, and personal resilience built around tangible assets, physical gold and silver, community, and the necessities of life. 

The objective is not fear. It is retaining choices before financial or monetary conditions make those choices more difficult. 

Prepare While You Still Have Choices 

Changes in banking, digital finance, government debt markets, access to resources, and monetary policy can feel disconnected. Lynette’s message is to look beneath the headlines and ask what has to keep functioning for an asset, account, or system to remain accessible. 

Understanding those dependencies is a critical part of wealth preservation. 

If you are evaluating what you truly own, where your financial dependencies sit, or how physical gold and silver could fit into a broader sound money strategy, Zang International’s strategy specialists can help you examine your goals, existing assets, and preparation priorities. 

Learn more about Zang International’s sound money strategies and how tangible assets, including physical gold and silver, may fit into your plan for financial freedom, wealth preservation, and preparation for monetary change.